My brand-new trading strategy is designed to help you profit from earnings volatility. Learn how this trading strategy works.
My brand-new trading strategy is designed to help you profit from earnings volatility. Learn how this trading strategy works.
Bespoke Investment Group is reporting that 10% of U.S. corporations are raising earnings expectations, compared to 4.1% that are lowering them. That’s the largest gap on record, and suggests that analysts still have earnings projections that are too low.
It’s hard to blame the analysts for being cautious. While the economy has improved, uncertainty about unemployment is an issue. It’s easy to imagine that consumer demand could drop. Still, let’s not ignore what corporations are saying. After all, they are the ones in direct communication with their customers. I can’t help but be a little optimistic that there is more upside for the stock market.
Don’t ignore the consolidation news from the commercial real estate sector this morning. Mall owner Simon Properties (NYSE: SPG) is offering $10 billion for its rival, General Growth Properties (NYSE: GGP).
Several investors and economists believe commercial real estate will be the next shoe to drop. And within that sector, shopping malls are probably the most beaten down group. That Simon Properties is considering a buyout means that it sees opportunity. And it is moves like these that often mark a bottom for an industry or sector.
I’ve recommended a commercial real estate stock that may have some terrific upside. Maguire Properties (NYSE: MPG) is back to its support level at $1.50. If you didn’t catch it there last time, you might want to give it a look.
My Washington DC office has been vacant all week. It’s amazing to me that record snowfalls have turned my DC staff into shut-ins (and closed the government for the third day) while life goes on at its normal pace here in Vermont.
The snowstorm that’s crippled the mid-Atlantic region will certainly have an impact on 1st quarter GDP. I would expect that 1st quarter retail numbers will be pretty bad. But there could be some good numbers for restaurants coming. The rally in the dollar over the last few weeks has lowered food costs. And I also think that once we see a thaw on the Eastern seaboard, people will shake off their cabin fever with a night out. I know I would…
I’m really on the fence with this one: did the Obama administration purposefully wait to attack the unemployment situation? Or is it just dumb luck?
I ask because it’s clear to me that now is the time to strike. If stimulus money had been used at this time last year to help the unemployment situation it wouldn’t have worked. Corporations were still in the process of cutting costs to meet lower demand. And at the time, demand itself was a moving target.
Now that the economy has stabilized, demand is returning and corporate earnings are on the upswing. So corporations are starting to hire again. New jobless claims are down again, as are continuing claims. The unemployment rate has dropped, and on-line employment ads are increasing.
The Conference Board, a non-profit global business organization, reported that online job demand is rapidly rising. According to the Conference Board, the total job vacancies advertised online today is over four million, or the same level as November 2008.
Seems to me, the added perk of government incentives, like a payroll tax holiday or tax credits for new hires, could give companies the final push needed to add employees.
I expect the recent volatility is on readers’ minds, so let’s get right to TradeMaster‘s Jason Cimpl and his outlook:
The bulls did not capitalize on Friday’s bullish close yesterday. Stocks were up strongly in the morning with most indices up more than half a percent. Those gains held into the afternoon and it seemed as though we were going to see a nice pop into the close. Then around three, the market started to turn red and indices sold off hard in the last hour of the day. But it is not over for the bulls.
Despite the weak afternoon, the SPX managed to close above 1065 support. Resistance was formidable at 1071, which is the price we will be watching for a break out today in a short squeeze.
Short interest picked up substantially. We closed down most of our shorts already (including one with a sweet 15% profit . Basically, the market is oversold and any pop up will be fast. We held onto most of our longs anticipating a move higher, possibly back up to 1120, but we will be selling into any rally.
It’s important to remember that the vast majority of stock trading volume comes from institutional investors like mutual funds, hedge funds, and even sovereign investment funds.
As Jason notes, stocks rolled over yesterday afternoon. That’s consistent with institutional trading, which tends to take place during the first and last hour of the trading day.
It’s also important to remember that institutional selling isn’t necessarily an indication of economic or earnings data. Part of the reason stock prices hit such lows last March was that banks and other investors had to raise cash at all costs. And that can mean selling assets, regardless of one’s outlook.
A similar situation may be happening right now. Greece (especially) and other European countries have debt problems. No doubt some of the selling activity we’ve seen lately is related to this. Investors are hopeful that a solution for Greece’s debt problems is on the horizon. That’s helping today’s upside bias. That hope is also boosting the euro against the U.S. dollar which is good for stocks and commodities.
Also, don’t dismiss the government’s new-found focus on employment. We’ve already started to see what may be a trend change for employment. Jobs are the missing link to the economic recovery. Good news on this front will certainly help stocks move higher.
Wow. Two strong rallies to kick off
February. It’s great to see some buying interest after January’s
sell-off. But I would caution that 2010 will be more volatile than the
final 9 months of 2009, when stocks were on a one-way trip higher.
could argue that stocks are overvalued based on index P/E levels. The
trailing P/E for the S&P 500 is 21. At the same time, companies are
once again beating earnings estimates. Business is better than analysts
The forward P/E for the S&P 500 is 14. That’s based
on analysts’ expectations of 2010 earnings. If analysts are once again
low-balling the numbers, then the S&P 500 may actually be cheap.
But if unemployment continues to weaken, or if banks don’t loosen up
lending, or if the housing market doesn’t improve, then perhaps stocks
And so, stock prices will very likely be more
volatile this year. That means it’s going to be even more important to
do good research and buy quality stocks at reasonable valuations. It’s
also going to be critical for investors to focus on the sectors that
will outperform this year. Of course, all of this will be part of our
ongoing conversation here in Daily Profit.
It sure was nice to see stocks make a nice
move higher yesterday. Especially after I came out yesterday and said
Dow 10,000 and S&P 500 1,071 were support points.
interesting that this advance came on the first day of February. Recall
that the positive GDP surprise came on Friday, the last trading day of
January. Investors were not interested in buying stocks in January. But
now that it’s February, the buyers are back.
It might seem
strange, but mutual funds and other institutional investors don’t base
their buy and sell decisions solely on making money. They have to play
the percentages. And that sometimes means taking profits when the
economic data supports better earnings and higher stock prices.
that what took stocks lower in January? Maybe, although it’s a little
too soon to say the upside trend has been re-established. But
sometimes, when you hear hoof-beats, it’s best to think horses not
The financial media has a
tendency to think zebras. The writers always want to find the reason
behind the selling. It’s China, maybe it is earnings, or is it economic
data? The list goes on. Of course, I’m not saying that these items
aren’t factors. But at the end of the day, it is institutional
investors that drive market direction. And like I said, they will take
profits sometimes, just because they can.
I managed to catch part of Treasury Secretary Geithner’s
testimony yesterday. I actually thought he represented himself pretty
well. I can appreciate his stance that AIG really was to big to fail.
But that notion that the New York Fed had to make sure all of AIG’s
credit default swaps were paid still doesn’t make sense.
Geithner’s explanation was that if AIG did pay off debts like
the $25 billion that went to Goldman, AIG would get downgraded and it
would become more expensive to unwind the company. Maybe I’m wrong, and
I haven’t checked to be sure, but I’m pretty sure AIG’s debt was
downgraded. And do you even need a rating for a company that’s 80%
owned by the government?
Bottom line: I still think former Treasury Secretary Paulson
made sure Goldman Sachs got paid and it really stinks that tax payers
get taken advantage of like that. Unfortunately, it’s unlikely anything
will come of it.
*****The Fed reiterated its pledge to keep
interest rates low for an extended period. No surprise there, but
investors liked the news. Stocks finished the day with a nice rally.
Still, it’s not like the Fed is keeping the liquidity spigots
wide open. The Fed plans to end its mortgage-backed securities
purchases. With so many stimulative monetary policies in place, low
interest rates will probably be the last thing to get changed.
is also d oing its part to soothe investors. According to Bloomberg,
China’s banking regulator has told lenders to "….step up scrutiny of
property loans while pledging to satisfy "reasonable" financing
I plan to be unavailable for a few hours, starting around 10 a.m.
this morning. I want to hear the members of the New York Fed try and
defend their actions regarding the AIG (NYSE: AIG) bailouts in front of Congress.
The New York Tines published
some of the prepared testimony of the principal players. I try to keep
a level head, but I’m reaching for my pitchfork and torch right now.
that the New York Fed orchestrated what ultimately became an $85
billion bailout. A good portion of that cash was paid directly to other
companies with which AIG had entered into the now famous credit default
swaps. These were essentially insurance contracts on mortgage backed
securities held by banks and underwritten by AIG.
A full $25 billion in AIG bailout money went to pay off Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS). Here’s a section from the New York Times (Mr. Baxter s the general counsel for the NY Fed):
Baxter explained that the New York Fed felt compelled to pay out
A.I.G.’s counterparties in full to unwind tens of billions of dollars
in derivative contracts because "there was little time, and substantial
execution risk and attendant harm of not getting the deal done by the
deadline of Nov. 10." That was the date when A.I.G. was scheduled to
report its earnings and could face downgrades from credit ratings
agencies. A downgrade would have led to more collateral calls and even
greater liquidity problems for A.I.G., Mr. Baxter said.
On the surface, earnings from IBM (NYSE: IBM) appeared excellent. The technology bellweather posted $3.59 a share in 4th Quarter earnings. That beat analysts’ expectations of $3.47 a share. IBM also beat slightly on revenues.
IBM also said 1st quarter revenues would be higher and even went so far as to raise earnings estimates for all of 2010. So why is the stock down?
Because IBM’s business services division, which includes consulting, reported a 2.8% drop in revenues. Obviously, strength in other divisions more than made up for it. But investors seem fixated on the negative.
Yes, the drumbeat of the skeptics rolls on…
I heard there’s a new slogan making the rounds in corporate accounting departments. "Flat is the new up." I have to admit, that got a chuckle out of me. But it’s true, flat really is the new up when it comes to sales volume, revenues, and even earnings to an extent.
And that maxim will be put to the test next week as we head into earnings season for the Fourth Quarter of 2009.
It’s the weirdest thing, but I’m always a little surprised by Q4 earnings. It just seems to sneak up as I’m easing back into full work mode right after the holiday season. I don’t think I’m alone here either, because I haven’t seen any mention of Q4 earnings in the media.
OK, that’s not exactly true. Meredith Whitney did offer up an earnings estimate cut for Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) earlier in the week. Ever since Whitney started her own firm, she’s seemed a bit more eager to make a splash in the headlines. I imagine her as a task master in her office: punctual, driven, strict, and humorless. Kind of like Dwight from The Office (yes, I catch that show on occasion).
*****Still, Whitney’s is the first recognition that earnings season starts with Alcoa (NYSE:AA) on Monday. It should also be noted that the market ignored Whitney’s Goldman earnings cut (the parallels with Dwight continue). Truly, flat is the new up.
Of course, investors will be looking for earnings growth. But I suspect if revenues come in flat and companies can give a somewhat encouraging outlook for 2010, stocks will hold current valuation, and may even move higher…